Critical Theories of Antisemitism

Concepts, Challenges and Emerging Research Agendas

June 18-20, 2026

ORGANIZATION : ARRAC, Bruno Quélennec, Salima Naït Ahmed, Philippe Mesnard, Solveig Hennebert

Co-Organizators: Mémoires en jeu;  Plateforme Internationale sur le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme (PIRA)

Campus Condorcet (Aubervilliers), Centre des Colloques, Auditorium 250

For several decades, critical theories of society have relegated contemporary antisemitism to the margins. Often regarded as “non-systemic” or “residual,” and associated primarily with the past, antisemitism appears to elude the traditional frameworks of social and political critique. In academic research, efforts to connect the study of antisemitism with analyses of other forms of domination and othering remain limited. This international conference aims to move beyond this situation and to fully reintegrate the question of antisemitism into contemporary critical theory.

!!!!This is a fully in-person conference, so no sessions will be live-streamed!!!!!

 

WITH (If you would like to learn more about our speakers and their contributions to the conference, click on their names!)

Beyond what society has made of us: Entangled histories and the politics of non-identity

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Friday June 19, Panel 4: Intersectionality and entangled histories (in English)

This paper pursues some of the questions that arise from the fact that antisemitism and different forms of racism, as well as constructions of gender and sexuality, are produced by the same society through processes of projection or rationalisation and justification of injustice, but in different ways. This has consequences, firstly, for how we think about the relationship of antisemitism and other forms of racialisation: Neither the idea of a categorical opposition of antisemitism and racism(s) nor one-dimensional continua of oppression or subsumptive conceptions of their relationship are able to grasp their differences and connections.

Secondly, in terms of political perspective, critical theory suggests moving beyond an understanding of discrimination as a zero-sum conflict between social groups. Social structures produce both injustice and, in a certain sense, the groups themselves that are positioned hierarchically within them. This also has consequences for conceptions of political subjectivity: If individual and collective identities are always also part and product of a destructive society rather than furnishing a standpoint ‘outside’, then a political practice that is directed towards emancipation also has to have a self-reflexive, self-critical dimension. The question arises whether identity politics always also ought to be a politics of non-identity.

While Adorno’s reflections are helpful for thinking through these issues, one might wonder whether his conception of the subject takes sufficient account of the material and differentiated ways oppression is experienced. The last part of my paper therefore tries to put writers such as Paul Gilroy, Nora Sternfeld, Omri Boehm and Jule Govrin in conversation with critical theory to explore the contours of a concept of ‘situated universalism’. 

Christine Achinger is Associate Professor of German Studies at the University of Warwick (UK). Her research focuses on critical social theory, literary studies, history and theories of antisemitism, and constructions of gender, race, Jewishness and national identity and their interrelations. Relevant publications include: ‘Essentialistische und kritische Theorie: Kolonialismus, Rassismus und Antisemitismus bei Mignolo, Virdee und Gilroy’, Zeitschrift für kritische Theorie 60/61, 2025; ‘Jews and other ‘others’: Identity and constellation in intersectional and critical theory’, in Marcel Stoetzler (ed.), Antisemitism and Critical Theory, 2023, Distorted Faces of Modernity: Racism, Antisemitism and Islamophobia, New York: Routledge, 2015 (ed. with Robert Fine); Gespaltene Moderne. Gustav Freytags Soll und Haben – Nation, Geschlecht und Judenbild, 2007. 

Chair Round table 2: Education and prevention (in English)

9:15 am – 10:15 am, Friday June 19

AND

Round table 3: Muslim antisemitism / Anti-Judaism? interdisciplinary approaches (In English)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Friday June 19

Dr. Sina Arnold is a senior researcher at the Center for Research on Antisemitism at Technical University Berlin and principal investigator at the Research Institute Social Cohesion. She studied Social Anthropology, Education and Political Sciences in Berlin and Manchester. Her work focuses on contemporary antisemitism in Germany and the United States, institutional racism, and the relationship between antisemitism and racism. In 2025/2026 she was a visiting professor on “Interdisciplinary Critique of Antisemitism and Racism” at the University of Bielefeld. In her current research project she analyzes transnational far-right discourses in the United States and Germany. 

Resisting Antisemitism after Gaza : Moral and Political Dilemmas

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 2: Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

Resisting Antisemitism, nationally and transnationally, is more than ever an urgent necessity, which however faces increasing difficulties. The processes of genocide and ethnic cleansing arguably taking place in Palestine foster reactions which target not only the State of Israel but Jewish individuals and communities, in the framework of a globalized “clash of civilizations”. Confusions between antisemitism and antizionism are facilitated, sometimes also instrumentalized. Worst of all, apologetic uses of the memory of the Shoah in order to justify or excuse criminal policies in the name of the “defense of the Jewish People” tend to debase its meaning and delegitimize its invocation against antisemitism. In this tragic situation, we must invent an ethical discourse that dissolves historical confusions, and sacrifices neither the protection of Jews and the valorisation of Jewishness, nor the active solidarity with the victims of colonial barbarity. This is a historic responsibility.

Etienne Balibar is Professor Emeritus of moral and political philosophy at Université de Paris X – Nanterre and Professor Emeritus of Humanities at the University of California, Irvine. He has published widely in the areas of epistemology, Marxist philosophy and moral and political philosophy in general. His many works include Race Nation, Class, Ambiguous identities (with Immanuel Wallerstein), Lire le Capital (with Louis Althusser, Pierre Macherey, Jacques Rancière, Roger Establet, and F. Maspero) (1965); Spinoza et la politique (1985); Nous, citoyens d’Europe? Les frontières, l’État, le peuple (2001); Politics and the Other Scene (2002); Citoyen Sujet et autres essais d’anthropologie philosophique (2011) ; Violence and Civility. On the Limits of Political Philosophy (2015).

Chair Panel 5: Antisemitism and Racism: Proximity, Differences, Intersections, Entanglements, Definitional Issues (in English)

9:15 am – 12:30 pm, Saturday June 20

Magali Bessone is a professor of political philosophy at the University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and a member of the Institut Universitaire de France. Her research focuses on contemporary theories of justice, reparations, and critical theories of race and racism. Her recent publications include Faire justice de l’irréparable (2019), W.E.B. Du Bois: double conscience et condition raciale (2021) co-written with Matthieu Renault, a Lexique des réparations de l’esclavage (2021) co-edited with Myriam Cottias. Her new book, Ce que nous devons à Haïti, is forthcoming (2026).

Entanglements between Antisemitism and colonial Racisms in Genealogical Perspective

9:15 am – 12:30 pm, Saturday June 20, Panel 5 : Antisemitism and Racism: Proximity, Differences, Intersections, Entanglements, Definitional Issues (in English)

Antisemitism and Colonial Racisms have often been studied independent of each other. Especially in Germany Antisemitism is even regarded as fundamentally distinct from other forms of Racism. My panel contribution aims instead to highlight the fundamental interconnections between different racist discourses. Therefore, I go back into European history revealing some traces of historical intersections between Anti-Judaism (resp. Anti-Semitism) and other Racisms from the Middle Ages up to the Modern Area. Right from the beginning, anti-Judaic stereotypes developed not isolated from other proto-racial discourses, applied for example to Saracens, Turks, Mongols and different kinds of ‘monstrous’ people. And conversely, during the colonial period, Ani-Judaistic discourses were of special importance for the formation of different types of Colonial Racisms. European missionaries and travellers transferred their notions of the Jewish “Other” for example to Indigenous People, Black Americans or Muslims. Others, such as the German anti-Semite Wilhelm Marr, translated their experience of racial segregation from the United States into a radicalized Antisemitism in Germany, so that Anti-Black Racisms itself became relevant for the shift from anti-Judaism to Antisemitism. Nevertheless, Jews were also imagined as hegemonic colonizers of European nations, oppressing especially the Germans. In summary, an intersectional perspective opens up options for perceiving Antisemitism with stronger consideration of its interrelations with Colonial Racisms, as well as in its symbolic function for colonization processes. This approach hopes to strengthen the potential to move away from competitive thinking between different groups affected by racism towards more mutual solidarity.

Claudia Bruns has held the Chair of “Historical Anthropology and Gender Studies” at the Department of “Cultural History and Theory” at the Humboldt University Berlin since 2013. She studied History, Philosophy, German Language and Literature at the Universities of Hamburg and Dublin and holds a phd in Medieval and Modern History. Her prominent work operates at the intersection of Cultural Studies & Historical Sciences, Gender & Racism Studies. She is associated board member of the “Selma Stern Center for Jewish Studies Berlin” and was, among other things, spokesperson for the DFG-Research Training Group “Gender as a Category of Knowledge” at Humboldt-University Berlin. Her research focuses on European Cultural History, Gender Studies, Racism and Antisemitism Studies, Memory of the Holocaust, History of the Body and (Homo)Sexuality, of European Borders and Boundaries, Discourse Analysis and Postcolonial Theory. With her monograph « Politics of Eros, » in which she examines the phenomenon of the ‘Männerbund’ from the German Empire to National Socialism she contributed not only to the history of masculinity, the body and homosexuality around 1900, but also to the analysis of pre-fascist movements and Antisemitism. A cultural-historical perspective on the relationship between race and space is the focus of another volume, which she edited during her time as a guest professor at the “Center for Cultural Studies” at the University of Trier. Early on, Claudia Bruns was interested in bringing transfer-analytical, intersectional, and postcolonial perspectives into the history of racism. This can be read, for instance, in the conceptual introduction to the volume “Wissen – Transfer – Differenz”, which analytically distinguishes three dimensions of entanglement and transfer processes in racial discourses. The racialized and gendered borders of Europe’s “political collective body” are the focus of another of Claudia’s monographs she is currently working on as well as on a volume on the Germany`s second “Historian Dispute”. Publications among others: Antisemitism and Colonial Racisms. Genealogical Perspectives, in: Colonialism and the Jews in German History. From the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century, ed. by S. Vogt (London, 2022), pp. 25–55; Wissen – Transfer – Differenz. Transnationale und interdiskursive Verflechtungen von Rassismen ab 1700, ed. with M. M. Hampf (Wallstein, 2018); How Gay is Germany? Homosexuality, Politics and Racism in Historical Perspective, in: Natio­nal Politics and Sexuality in Transregional Perspective: The Homophobic Argument, ed. by C. v. Braun, S. Schüler-Springorum, A. Rohde (Ashgate, 2018), pp. 88-104; Rasse‘ und Raum. Topolo­gien zwischen Kolonial-, Geo- und Biopolitik. Geschichte, Kunst, Erinnerung, ed. by C. Bruns (Wiesbaden, 2016); Rassismus, in: Gender & Wissen. Ein Handbuch der Gender-Theorien, ed. by C. Braun / I. Stefan, 3rd edn (UTB, 2013); ‘Politics of Eros: The German “Männerbund” – Discourse between Antifeminism and Anti-Semitism at the Beginning of the 20th Century’, in: Masculinity, Senses, and Spirit in German, French and British Culture, ed. by K. Faull (Bucknell UP, 2011); Antisemitism and Colonial Racism. Transnational and Interdiscursive Intersectionality, in: Racisms Made in Ger­many, (Racism Analysis | Yearbook 2), 2011, pp. 99–12; Towards a Transnational History of Racism: Interrelationships between Colonial Racism and German Anti-Semitism? The Example of Wilhelm Marr, in: Racism in the Modern World: Historical Perspectives on Cultural Transfer and Adaptation, ed. by Manfred Berg u.a. (Berghahn Books, 2011), pp. 122–139.

Round table 4: Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (in French/en français)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Professeur de science politique à l’Open University of Israel (Ra’anana), Denis Charbit est l’auteur de : Qu’est-ce que le sionisme ? Albin Michel, 2024 ; Israël, l’impossible Etat normal, Calmann-Lévy (coll. Diaspora). Sur l’antisémitisme et l’antisionisme,  il a publié les articles suivants : « Pour en finir avec le cas Alfred Fabre-Luce. Ultime apparition d’un antisémitisme suranné ou naissance d’un type nouveau ? », Archives Juives, 2022/2 (Vol. 56), p. 92-118 ; « Qu’est-ce que l’antisionisme ? », Revue Alarmer, mai 2024, pp. 1-13 ; « Antisionisme=Antisémitisme : pour un examen raisonné d’une équation controversée », Hérodote n°198, 2025, pp. 11-27.

Round table 4: Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (in French/en français)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Theo Cohen is an agrégé teacher of History and Geography at Lycée Frédéric Faÿs in Villeurbanne and an academic trainer with the École Académique de la Formation Continue de Lyon. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Geography at Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3, affiliated with the Environnement Ville Société research unit (UMR 5600), under the supervision of Dominique Chevalier. His publications and related work include “Enseigner le conflit israélo-palestinien,” Daï (September 2024); “Enseigner le conflit israélo-palestinien au prisme des mémoires concurrentes,” Mémoires en Jeu (1 November 2025); and Histoires parallèles, une nouvelle approche pédagogique du conflit Israël-Palestine, Le Blob (23 October 2024).

Round table 2: Education and prevention (in English)

9:15 am – 10:15 am, Friday June 19

Janis Detert
is a sociologist and has been with the Bildungsstätte Anne Frank (Anne Frank Educational Center) in Frankfurt since 2021. There, he leads the educational team and develops events and projects focused on political education. The Bildungsstätte Anne Frank was founded in 1994 and works to combat antisemitism and racism and promote an open and democratic society through events, publications, public interventions, and, most recently, with a particular focus on digital spaces.

Round table 4: Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (in French/en français)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Benoît Drouot is an Associate Professor (Agrégé) in History and Geography, teaching at secondary-school level and at the National Institute for Teacher Education (INSPE) of Reims, France. He is a trainer for the French Ministry of Education on issues related to combating racism and antisemitism. He serves as Vice-President of ALARMER (Association for Combating Antisemitism and Racism through Education and Research) and is a member of the editorial board of RevueAlarmer. His research and publications focus on the teaching of racism and antisemitism, with particular attention to the role of history curricula in secondary education. He has published articles and opinion pieces in RevueAlarmer, Cahiers pédagogiques, Humanisme, Le Monde, and DDV. He is the author of Lutte contre les racismes et les antisémitismes. Pour un autre récit scolaire, Hermann, 2025 (Combating Racism and Antisemitism: Towards a New Educational Narrative).

Round table 3: Muslim antisemitism / Anti-Judaism? interdisciplinary approaches (In English)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Friday, June 19

Amir Dziri completed his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Islamic Studies at the University of Bonn from 2004 to 2010. From 2011 to 2012, he was a research assistant in Islamic studies at the University of Erfurt. From 2011 to 2017, he was a research assistant at the Centre for Islamic Theology at the University of Münster, where he completed his PhD in 2015. In 2017, he was appointed to a professorship in Islamic Studies at the Swiss Centre for Islam and Society at the University of Fribourg. In 2020, he completed a second Master’s degree in Higher Education and Science Management at WWU Weiterbildung GmbH. Amir Dziri specialises in contemporary Islamic thought and culture. His research focuses on Islamic knowledge, canonisation theory and religious sciences. He recently elaborated on a new understanding of Islamic discursive theology (2023).

Suspicious Integration: Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in Republican France

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Saturday, June 20, Panel 6: Antisemitism and Islamophobia: longue-durée History and Challenges of Colonial Memory (in English)

This paper examines anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in contemporary France through the question of integration. Comparative approaches generally analyse these phenomena through representations, prejudice, or competing forms of racialisation. This paper instead argues that anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are linked to distinct historical configurations of minority incorporation into the French republican order.

Hamza Esmili in an anthropologist of religion and an Ambizione Lecturer at the University of Lausanne. He recently published La cité des musulmans (Amsterdam, 2025) and L’islam après l’exil (Seuil, 2026). He is currently working on a biography of Mahmoud Darwish (La Découverte, 2027).

Antisemitism and racism: two concepts in history

9:15 am – 12:30 pm, Saturday, June 20, 9:15 am – 12:30 pm, Saturday, June 20, Panel 5: Antisemitism and Racism: Proximity, Differences, Intersections, Entanglements, Definitional Issues (in English)

Academic and public debate over whether antisemitism is a form of racism has taken a stipulative form. Participants establish (or assume) the key characteristics of antisemitism and racism and, following from this, they establish the relationship (or the lack of relationship) between the two phenomena. These discussions have not been conclusive. In part, this is because the participants tend to assume that antisemitism and racism exist as such when both terms are better understood as concepts gather disparate phenomena under a single umbrella. Inevitably, the meanings ascribed to the terms antisemitism and racism have changed over time and are themselves subject to debate. By addressing antisemitism and racism as concepts with a history, this paper abandons the stipulative endeavour and, instead, makes an attempt to trace the relationship between antisemitism and racism as these have been invoked by academic and political actors in changing political contexts.

David Feldman is a Professor of History at Birkbeck, University of London and Co-director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Study of Antisemitism, he is also Professor of History in antisemitism at the University of Melbourne. His recent publications include (with Ben Gidley and Brendan McGeever) Facing Antisemitism: the struggle for safety and solidarity (2025) and (edited with Marc Volovici) Antisemitism, Islamophobia and the Politics of Definition (Palgrave, 2023).  He has written for The Guardian, The Financial Times, Haaretz, The New Statesman, The Independent, The Political Quarterly, The Ideas Letter.

Round table 3: Muslim antisemitism / Anti-Judaism? interdisciplinary approaches (In English)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Friday June 19

Reuven Firestone is the Regenstein Professor in medieval Judaism and Islam at Hebrew Union College, Los Angeles and Affiliate Professor in the Department of Religion at the University of Southern California. His books include Journeys in Holy Lands: The Abraham-Ishmael Legends in Islamic Exegesis; Learned Ignorance: Intellectual Humility among Jews, Christians and Muslims, with James Heft and Omid Safi; Jihad: The Origin of Holy War in Islam; Holy War in Judaism: the Fall and Rise of a Controversial Idea; Who are the Real Chosen People: The Meaning of “Chosenness” in Judaism, Christianity and Islam; An Introduction to Islam for Jews, and An Introduction to Judaism for Muslims. His most recent book, Polemics and Prophethood: Pre-modern Jewish Writings on Muhammad and Islam will be released this year (2026). He received rabbinical ordination from Hebrew Union College and his Ph.D. in Arabic and Islamic Studies from New York University. He has served as Vice President of the Association for Jewish Studies and President of the International Qur’anic Studies Association, and recently stepped down from chair of the International Abrahamic Forum of the International Council of Christians and Jews.

Chair Panel 1 : Critical Theory of Antisemitism I : Looking Back at the Work of the Early Frankfurt School (in English)  

10 am – 12:45 pm, Thursday, June 18

Katia Genel is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris Nanterre. Her research focuses on the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, from its origins to its contemporary developments, and on the work of Hannah Arendt. Her recent work brings together philosophy of labor and feminist theory. She is the author of Autorité et émancipation. Horkheimer et la Théorie critique (Payot, 2013) and L’oubli du labeur. Arendt et les théories féministes du travail (Klincksieck, 2025), and co-edited with Jean-Philippe Deranty Recognition or Disagreement? A Critical Encounter on the Politics of Freedom, Equality, and Identity (CUP, 2016). 

Anti-semitism and Non-Identity (with Ilka Quindeau)

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 2: Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

Our lecture examines the gender images constructed against Jews* and how they relate to Adorno’s philosophy. At the heart of *Negative Dialectics* lies the idea that the non-identical is produced and repelled by the compulsion toward identity. The non-identical is the excluded third of the identity between identity and difference. Anti-Semitic gender images follow this pattern. They define the gender of Jews* as non-identical, which undermines the heteronormative identity of man and woman.

Klaus Holz, Ph.D., habil., is a sociologist. He served for many years as Secretary General of the Protestant Academies in Germany. He has taught at the universities of Freiburg, Leipzig, and Bielefeld, as well as at the Vienna University of Economics and Business. In 2014, he was appointed to the German Federal Government’s “Independent Expert Group on Anti-Semitism.” His research focuses on anti-Semitism, nationalism, racism, and religion. He currently works as an author and consultant in the field of anti-Semitism research for publishers, ministries, foundations, and NGOs. Together with Ilka Quindeau, he is currently writing the book “Critical Theory of Anti-Semitism: Culture, Psyche, Society” (working title). Main publications:  2026: (with Jan Weyand), Die Figur des Dritten. Zur Soziologie des Antisemitismus, Hamburg: Hamburger Edition. 2021: (with Thomas Haury),  Antisemitismus gegen Israel, 2. Aufl., Hamburg: Hamburger Edition. 2010: Nationaler Antisemitismus. Wissenssoziologie einer Weltanschauung, Hamburg: Hamburger Edition (Studienausgabe).

The Frankfurt School and Antisemitism from Horkheimer to Marcuse

10 am – 12:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 1 : Critical Theory of Antisemitism I : Looking Back at the Work of the Early Frankfurt School (in English)

In the period beginning with the 1940s major figures closely associated with the Frankfurt School devoted sustained attention to the study of antisemitism.  Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno revisited the theme of antisemitism a number of times in the post-World War II era, and made it clear, in those years, that they considered it to be a subject of major consequence.  But not all of the Critical Theorists shared Horkheimer and Adorno’s abiding interest in explaining and combatting hatred of Jewry in the latter decades of their careers.  Herbert Marcuse, notably, wrote relatively little about antisemitism or the Holocaust.  Marcuse did not, in the years following the end of World War II, theorize (much) either about the larger significance of the extermination of European Jewry or about the continued existence of antisemitism in the contemporary world. Differences between Horkheimer and Adorno on the one hand and Marcuse on the other on matters related to antisemitism may well be rooted in somewhat deeper distinctions, and, in particular, in differences in the ways in which these thinkers ultimately assessed relationships between universalism and particularism.

Jack Jacobs is Professor of Political Science at John Jay College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, and is chair of the Graduate Center’s Ph.D./M.A. Program in Political Science. He is the author of On Socialists and “the Jewish Question” after Marx (1992), Bundist Counterculture in Interwar Poland (2009), and The Frankfurt School, Jewish Lives, and Antisemitism (2015), and is the editor of Jewish Politics in Eastern Europe: The Bund at 100 (2001) and of Jews and Leftist Politics (2017).  Professor Jacobs has served as a Fulbright Scholar at both Tel Aviv University and the Vilnius Yiddish Institute, as the Louis and Helen Padnos Visiting Professor of Judaic Studies at the University of Michigan, as the Jacob Kronhill Visiting Scholar at the YIVO Institute, as a Visiting Fellow of the British Academy, and as a Visiting Scholar at the Australian Centre for Jewish Civilisation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Do antisemitic and racist images differ?

10:30 am – 12:30 pm, Friday, June 19, Panel 3: Definitions, periodizations and typologies of antisemitism – Old questions, new approaches in historical and cultural sciences (in English)

The lecture introduces the concept of hate-picture by discussing modern visual material. It focusses specifically on antisemitic and (colonial-) racist imagery from the 19th and 20th century. The aim is to make an empirically grounded contribution to the heated debates surrounding the relationship of antisemitism and racism. On the one hand, the lecture will highlight important similarities between the two, not least the crucial relationship between visuality and emotionality. On the other hand, the primary uses of caricatures (in the context of antisemitism) and of photography (in the case of colonial racism) point to the different functions of such images.

Prof. Dr. Uffa Jensen is a historian at the Center for Research on Antisemitism at the Technische Universität in Berlin and its deputy director. His research interests are the history of antisemitism, of German Jewry, of psychoanalysis, of the history of emotions as well as visual history. He has previously worked at the University of Sussex, the Universität Göttingen and the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. His most relevant publications include „Gebildete Doppelgänger. Bürgerliche Juden und Protestanten im 19. Jahrhundert“ (Göttingen 2005), „Gefühle gegen Juden. Die Emotionsgeschichte des modernen Antisemitismus (together with Stefanie Schüler-Springorum 2013), „Zornpolitik“ (Berlin 2017), „Wie die Couch nach Kalkutta kam: Eine Globalgeschichte der frühen Psychoanalyse“ (Berlin 2019) and „Ein antisemitischer Doppelmord. Die vergessene Geschichte des Rechtsterrorismus in der Bundesrepublik“ (Berlin 2022)

Missing Memmi in Critical Theories of Anti-Semitism

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 2: Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

“Missing Memmi in Critical Theories of Anti-Semitism” will be framed around why there is no chapter on Memmi in my book Critical Theories of Anti-Semitism even though he was so central to the underlying project. I will spotlight all the ways in which he appears, but often only in footnotes or fleeting thoughts despite his centrality to reconceptualizing concepts, rethinking the relationship between racism and anti-Semitism, his importance for the evolution in Sartre’s multidirectional existentialist approach, how Memmi differs from Jankélévitch and Poliakov in his meta-reflections on anti-Semitism, and ultimately what Memmi contributes to critical theories of anti-Semitism.

Jonathan Judaken is the Gloria M. Goldstein Professor of Jewish History and Thought at Washington University in St. Louis. He has published more than 50 academic articles on the history of existentialism, critical theory, anti-Semitism, racism, and post-Holocaust French Jewish thought. He has written, edited, or co-edited 7 books, most recently Critical Theories of Anti-Semitism (Columbia University Press, June 2024), which was awarded the Dorothy Rosenberg Prize by the American Historical Association for the most distinguished work of scholarship on the history of the Jewish diaspora written in English in the past year. He is currently completing Judeophobia and Anti-Semitism: A Primary Source Reader from its Origins to the Present (Palgrave).

Antisemitism and Islamophobia in the Colonial Frame – Secret Sharers or Competing Hatreds?

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Saturday, June 20, Panel 6: Antisemitism and Islamophobia: longue-durée History and Challenges of Colonial Memory (in English)

In French Algeria, antisemitism and Islamophobia were a basic feature of colonial society. At times, the French colons perceived Muslims and Jews as effectively racial siblings, knitted together by common ancestry and characteristics that made them other, even if locked in periodic fratricidal conflict. At other times they actually encouraged that conflict by pitting the two groups against each other. For most of the last century of French rule in Algeria, Jews were legally superior to Muslims, but Muslims were also courted at times by the same conservative forces that oppressed them, in an effort to turn them against Jews. In the end, this paper suggests that this predicament reveals fundamental features of Algeria as in key respects a settler-colonial society, where the colons sought claims to both Europeanness and indigeneity. These claims in part depended upon constantly constructing and re-constructing the Otherness of the territory’s actual natives — Muslims and Jews — through legal inequality, violence, and racial hierarchy.

Ethan Katz is Associate Professor of History at UC-Berkeley, where is also the Helen Diller Family Faculty Director of the Center for Jewish Studies. Katz’s research interests include Jewish-Muslim relations, Jews in colonial societies, Holocaust studies, and the interplay between religious and secular in modern Jewish life. His first book, The Burdens of Brotherhood: Jews and Muslims from North Africa to France (Harvard, 2015), received a number of prizes, including a National Jewish Book Award and the J. Russell Major Prize of the American Historical Association. The book was translated into French in 2018 and became the basis for a major exhibition in 2022 at the Musée Nationale de l’Histoire de l’Immigration at the Porte Dorée. Katz has co-edited three other books, including Colonialism and the Jews, which was a finalist for a National Jewish Book Award, and most recently When Jews Argue: Between the University and the Beit Midrash (Routledge, 2024). His newest book, currently entitled Unsettling Histories: Rethinking Zionism and Colonialism, marshals new historical perspectives on Israel, Palestine, Algeria, and other colonial and decolonial contexts to rethink the current moment in Jewish history, and is under contract with Princeton University Press. He has published articles in the American Historical Review, French Historical Studies, Jewish Quarterly Review, and a number of other important journals. His research has been supported by a number of prestigious grants and fellowships, including from the Katz Center for Advanced Judaic Studies at the University of Pennsylvania and the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, at the Hebrew University.

Antisemitism as a Specific Form of Racism: the Clustered Continuum View

9:15 am – 12:30 pm, Saturday, June 20, Panel 5 : Antisemitism and Racism: Proximity, Differences, Intersections, Entanglements, Definitional Issues (in English)

Those who understand antisemitism as a form of racism have effectively criticized what I call the separation thesis, i.e., the view that antisemitism is categorically different from racism: central to antisemitism is not the construction of Jews as superior, but as both superior and inferior and therefore fundamentally ambivalent; the Shoah was not the only genocide in history with an intention of total extermination; conspiracy thinking can be found in other forms of racism as well, etc. However, these critics have not been very successful in elaborating an account of what it means to understand antisemitism as a specific form of racism. They have either moved towards ad hoc historiographies, doubting the generality of antisemitism (and by implication of racism)—a route taken prominently by David Engel—or they have reproduced the separation thesis within the category of racism by counterposing two different ideal types: a superiority-extermination vs. an inferiority-exploitation type of racism—a suggestion made, for example, by Pierre-André Taguieff. What I want to suggest as an alternative to ad hoc historiographies and ideal-type constructions is an anti-essentialist realism about socio-historical kinds that gives rise to a conception I call the clustered continuum view. An important theoretical resource for this view is Richard Boyd’s homeostatic property cluster (HPC) account of natural kinds and its application to critical social science projects by authors like Howard Engelskirchen, Ron Mallon, and Ted Bach. According to this view, antisemitism is on a continuum with other racisms. Still, it has distinctive features, i.e., the construction of Jews as fundamentally ambivalent, a drive toward elimination (in Patrick Wolfe’s double sense of extermination and assimilation), and conspiracy thinking with a global reach. These distinctive features may be best understood as a property cluster: they are—in Boyd’s words—neither necessary nor sufficient but constitutive characteristics. This view is anti-essentialist to the extent that it allows for instances of antisemitism that do not exhibit (all of) these features. What nevertheless unites the different instances into a socio-historical kind called antisemitism is, besides its Jewish target group, an underlying mechanism of racialization. By racialization, I understand the dehumanizing imposition of threat and/or inferiority attributes, with phenotype, descent or origin (including religion) being its markers. It is this underlying mechanism of racialization that justifies both the classification of antisemitism within the higher-taxa concept of racism and its placement on a continuum with other racisms. These other racisms may be theorized in the same anti-essentialist way as property-clusters unified by racialization. To be sure, this view depends on the plausibility of the suggested conception of racialization. There are good reasons not to narrow it to the concept of race. On the other hand, conceptual inflation may be avoided by consistently distinguishing between racialization and ethnicization: whereas the latter may be both horizontal and hierarchical, the former denotes dehumanizing hierarchization.

Urs Lindner is a philosopher with a specialization in political philosophy, social philosophy, and the philosophy of the social sciences. He is currently affiliated with the Centre for Global Cooperation Research at the University of Duisburg-Essen (Germany), where he coordinates a research laboratory on memory politics. Urs has a PhD in philosophy from Freie Universität Berlin; his PhD-thesis was published in 2013 under the title Marx und die Philosophie. Wissenschaftlicher Realismus, ethischer Perfektionismus und kritische Sozialtheorie. In 2024, he finished his habilitation/second book with a monograph titled: An Egalitarian Justification of Affirmative Action: Non-Ideal Theory and the Scope of Political Philosophy. Urs held postdoctoral positions at the Max-Weber-Kolleg of the University of Erfurt and at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich. He was a visitant scholar at the Center for Antisemitism Research at the Technical University Berlin, at the Centre for the Study of Developing Society, Delhi, at the Science and Policy Forum of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and at the Postwachstumskolleg of the University of Jena. For many years, Urs has been involved in local decolonial initiatives in Germany, participating in science-in-public-projects that investigated the colonial history of the cities of Erfurt and Wuppertal. From this engagement emerged works on the so-called “Second Historiker:innenstreit”, the question of the uniqueness of the Shoah, the relationship between antisemitism and racism, and the evolving German remembrance of slavery. Currently, Urs is living in San José, Costa Rica, where he teaches German at the Centro Goethe.

Chair Panel 4: Intersectionality and entangled histories (in English)

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Friday, June 19.

Elissa Mailänder is a Professor of History at Sciences Po CHSP) Paris and an associated research fellow at the Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin. A historian of everyday life and gender, her research focuses on the practices, structures, and mechanisms of violence in Nazi Germany and World War II (Workaday Violence: The Majdanek Concentration Camp, 1942– 1944, Michigan State University Press 2015 and Amour, mariage, sexualité. Une histoire intime du nazisme, 1930- 1950, Seuil, 2021 (translated into English : An Intimate History of Nazism. Love, Marriage, and Sexuality in the Third Reich, Wisconsin University Press, fortcoming October 2026). Together with Tom Streuber she is co-leading the interdisciplinary collaborative project Trophy Photographs in WWII where fifteen international scholars, collectors, and artists explore performative transgressions in private soldier photography in a transnational perspective.

Round table 1: Education and prevention (en français/in French)

6 pm – 7:30 pm, Thursday June 18

AND

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Round table 4 : Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (en français/in French)

Marie-Anne Matard-Bonucci est Professeure à l’Université Paris 8. Ses travaux portent sur l’histoire du fascisme, de l’antisémitisme et de la violence politique. Elle a notamment publié L’Italie fasciste et la persécution des Juifs (PUF, 2012), Totalitarisme fasciste (CNRS Ed. 2018) et co-dirigé la Storia della Shoah in Italia (UTET 2 vol.) Engagée dans la lutte contre les racismes et l’antisémitisme elle préside l’Association ALARMER et dirige RevueAlarmer: https://revue.alarmer.org . En 2025 elle a piloté, pour la partie formation, les Assises de lutte contre l’antisémitisme dont le rapport est publié en ligne : https://www.dilcrah.gouv.fr/files/2025-04/RAPPORT%20ASSISES.pdf

Chair Panel 3: Definitions, periodizations and typologies of antisemitism – Old questions, new approaches in historical and cultural sciences (in English)

10:30 am – 12:30 pm, Friday, June 19

Philippe Mesnard est professeur des universités en Littérature comparée à l’UCA (Université Clermont Auvergne), chercheur permanent au CELIS (Centre de recherche sur les littératures et la sociopoétique) et membre senior de l’Institut universitaire de France depuis 2017 où il occupe la chaire fondamentale « énonciation testimoniale et écriture collective » (https://www.iufrance.fr/les-membres-de-liuf/membre/1791-philippe-mesnard.html). Il dirige la revue Mémoires en jeu (www.memoires-en-jeu.com). Il travaille depuis une trentaine d’années sur les témoignages et la mémoire de la Shoah, en particulier, et sur les configurations des mémoires des violences collectives, en général.

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Round table 4: Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (en français/ in French)

Bio To come

Chair Panel 2: Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18

Salima Naït Ahmed is a Research Fellow in the Department of Zeitgeschichte at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland. She specializes in the Frankfurt School, particularly Adorno, and revisited his work from a feminist perspective in her doctoral dissertation in philosophy. In her current Swiss Postdoc Fellowship, she examines the intertwining of gender and antisemitism in German and French philosophy during the Enlightenment period. On anti-semitism, she recently published: with Bruno Quélennec, Penser l’antisémitisme contemporain, Anthologie critique (L’Aube, 2026); « Sartre is Back on His Feet. Adorno and Sartre on Anti-Semitism », Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, New School, Volume 47, Number 1, 2026; « Stigmate et racialisation perceptive dans les Éléments de l’antisémitisme d’Adorno et de Horkheimer », in Histoires féministes de la philosophie. Perspectives francophones, dir. Hourya Bentouhami, Aurélie Knüfer et Vanina Mozziconacci, 2027, Paris, Éditions de le Sorbonne; « Constellations et intersections. Une approche de l’imbrication du genre et de l’antisémitisme à partir de la Théorie critique », in : L. Barbisan, A. Grivaux et B. Quélennec (dir.), Prismes, Théorie critique, volume 5 : « Antisémitisme et Théorie critique aujourd’hui», mars 2023, p. 241-289.

Chair Panel 1: Round table 1: Education and prevention (en français / in French)

6 pm – 7:30 pm, Thursday June 18

Bio To come

Anti-semitism and Non-Identity (with Klaus Holz)

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 2 : Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

 Our lecture examines the gender images constructed against Jews* and how they relate to Adorno’s philosophy. At the heart of *Negative Dialectics* lies the idea that the non-identical is produced and repelled by the compulsion toward identity. The non-identical is the excluded third of the identity between identity and difference. Anti-Semitic gender images follow this pattern. They define the gender of Jews* as non-identical, which undermines the heteronormative identity of man and woman.

Ilka Quindeau is a psychoanalyst (DPV/IPA) in private practice and Full Professor of Clinical Psychology and Psychoanalysis at Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences. She was President of the International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) in Berlin from 2018-2020 and currently works as a Guest Professor at the Interdisciplinary Center for women and gender studies at the Technical University of Berlin. Her work and research focus on gender and sexuality, biography and trauma studies, and aftermath of National Socialism.  She is the author of numerous monographs, such as « Seduction and Desire – The Psychoanalytic Theory of Sexuality since Freud » (Routledge 2013), « Spur und Umschrift – Die konstitutive Bedeutung von Erinnerung für die Psychoanalyse » (Fink 2004); « Sexualität » (Psychosozial 2014); “Psychoanalyse und Antisemitismus“ (Suhrkamp 2025). She is currently also researching  on body politics, the authoritarian personality, conspiracy narratives, and anti-Semitism.

The Theological Looking Glass: Anti-Palestinian Racism and Antisemitism in the Longue Durée

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Saturday, June 20, Panel 6: Antisemitism and Islamophobia: longue-durée History and Challenges of Colonial Memory (in English)

A decade ago, Ben Gidley and I completed our book on the relational paradigm for understanding antisemitism and Islamophobia across a millennium of European history. We recruited scholars across multiple fields and geographical specialisations to investigate this complex story, from Russia to the UK, via the Crusader States. We explored the impact of the nation-state, race-thinking, colonialism, war, and the end of empire. Above all, our model unveiled the determining frame of Christian theology. In this paper, I will discuss a critical aspect of this story that was missing from our model. I will argue that the centrality of Christian theology in the relationship between antisemitism and Islamophobia had a major consequence for our story from late nineteenth century Orientalism, through to the present: the racialised erasure of Palestinians and the Zionisation of Jewishness.

James Renton is Professor of History at Edge Hill University, UK, and Co-Director of the Racial Justice and Migration Research Group. A former President of the British and Irish Association for Jewish Studies, he is the co-editor with Ben Gidley of Antisemitism and Islamophobia in Europe: A Shared Story? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).

Smothering (the Fight Against) Antisemitism

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Friday,  June 19, Panel4: Intersectionality and entangled histories (in English)

Just one year into his second term, the Trump administration has—under the guise of fighting antisemitism—shattered preexisting norms that historically acted to limit governmental power. These actions have been widely criticized on a multitude of grounds, an obvious one being the chilling effect such suppression has had on pro-Palestinian expression. This Article, however, will draw attention to another, less obvious impact of these endeavors: the chilling effect they have on Jewish students experiencing antisemitism. This may seem counterintuitive. The critique of the Trump administration’s actions seems to be that it is overzealous and overwrought in its efforts against antisemitism. It may capture too much; it is hard to fathom it will capture too little. But drawing on the literature on epistemic injustice, and in particular Kristie Dotson’s seminal work on “testimonial smothering,” I will argue that in many cases, Jews experiencing antisemitism will be systematically deterred from speaking out about their experiences and seeking redress, for fear that they will be involuntarily conscripted into a project of political repression they do not support. Moreover, this deterrent effect may afflict most strongly those Jews whose experiences of antisemitism facially align with those the Trump administration purports to focus on (i.e., left-wing antisemitism emanating from pro-Palestine protests).

David Schraub is an Associate Professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, where he teaches classes on constitutional law and anti-discrimination law. He holds a BA from Carleton College, a JD from the University of Chicago Law School, and a PhD from the University of California, Berkeley.

Religion & Racism: Towards an entangled understanding of Antisemitism

10:30 am – 12:30 pm, Friday, June 19, Panel 3: Definitions, periodizations and typologies of antisemitism – Old questions, new approaches in historical and cultural sciences (in English)

For a long time, scholarly research proceeded from the assumption that one must distinguish between a religious, Christian-motivated, and pre-modern hostility toward Jews, and a modern, secular, scientifically grounded, and racist antisemitism. A synthesis of numerous research findings from recent decades demonstrates that this distinction is flawed in both chronological directions: neither is pre-modern anti-Judaism devoid of racist elements, nor is modern antisemitism—extending right up to the present day—comprehensible without taking religious aspects into account. Furthermore, one must be aware that by strictly distinguishing between pre-modern and modern forms of hostility toward Jews, one is effectively reverting to problematic narratives propagated by historical contemporaries.

Stefanie Schüler-Springorum studied History, Ethnology and Political Science in Göttingen and Barcelona. After her dissertation on the Jewish community of Königsberg (Göttingen 1996), she co-curated an exhibition on Berlin Jewish History and conducted a reseach project on a radical leftist Jewish youth movement. Between 2001-2011 she served as the Director of the Institute for German-Jewish history in Hamburg; since 2011 as Director of the Center for Research on Antisemitism, since 2012 as Co- Director of the Selma-Stern-Center for Jewish Studies, both in in Berlin, and since 2020 Director of the Berlin branch of the Center for Research on Social Cohesion. Her fields of research encompass Jewish, German and Spanish History in the modern era, and a gendered perspective permeates all her work. Recent publications: Hans Litten. Anwalt gegen Hitler, Göttingen 2022 (with K. Bergbauer and S. Fröhlich); Football and Discrimination. Antisemitism and beyond, London 2021 (ed. with P. Brunssen); Emotionen und Antisemitismus. Geschichte – Literatur – Theorie (ed. with J. Süselbeck), Göttingen 2021; Four Years After: Antisemitism and Racism in Trump’s America (ed. with N. and M. Zadoff, H. Paul), Munich 2020; Gender and the Politics of Anti-Semitism, in: American Historical Review 123 (2018), pp. 1210–1222, La Guerra como Aventura. La Legión Cóndor en la Guerra Civil Española 1936 – 1939, Madrid (Alianza) 2014.

Chair Round table 3: Muslim antisemitism / Anti-Judaism? interdisciplinary approaches (In English)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Friday, June 19

Jonas Sibony was born in Paris into a family of Moroccan and Polish Jewish origin, in which several languages were spoken, including Yiddish, Spanish, and Judeo-Moroccan Arabic. He pursued his studies at the National Institute of Oriental Languages in Paris, where he studied Arabic and Hebrew. He later taught at several French universities, including the National Institute of Oriental Languages and Civilizations (INALCO), the University of Strasbourg, and Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, before obtaining a position at Sorbonne University as Maître de Conférences (Associate Professor) in Hebrew linguistics. Over the course of his career, he taught Judeo-Moroccan Arabic for ten years at INALCO in Paris. He offers courses and specializes in comparative Semitic linguistics, Biblical Hebrew, Hebrew grammar, Modern Hebrew, and Arabic dialectology. His research focuses on Semitic languages, the linguistics and sociolinguistics of Modern Hebrew, the influence of Moroccan Arabic on Modern Hebrew, and, above all, the Arabic dialects spoken by the Jews of Morocco.  

Entangled Histories: Antisemitism, Orientalism, and Structural Racism

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Friday, June 19, Panel 4: Intersectionality and entangled histories (in English)

As in other countries, antisemitism in Switzerland during the first half of the twentieth century did not exist in isolation but was intertwined with other ideologies of exclusion. This contribution demonstrates how, at the beginning of the twentieth century, structural racism took root under the pretext of an alleged “foreign infiltration” of Swiss economy, culture, and society. Antisemitism formed an integral part of this structural racism, often accompanied by Orientalism and other expressions of racisms. The contribution traces these entanglements while also demonstrating how antisemitism was able to draw upon a long-standing tradition of “othering” Jews in order to deny them entry into the country.

Christina Späti is professor of contemporary history at the University of Fribourg and at UniDistance Switzerland. She specializes in the history of antisemitism, Orientalism and anti-Zionism as well as in the Holocaust and its aftermath.

Antisemitism, anti-capitalism, community: the antisemitic dream of non-corrosive modernity

2:15pm – 5:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 2: Critical Theory of Antisemitism II: Extensions and Updates (in English)

I will argue that the dialectic of capitalism and emancipation is central to understanding antisemitism. I will use a discussion of the concepts ‘left’ and ‘right’, dating from the period of the French Revolution, in terms of liberté, fraternité and égalité to distinguish elements of antisemitism that accuse ‘the Jews’ of either promoting or obstructing (liberal or socialist) progress that in turn is linked in contradictory ways to the capitalist mode of production and the nation state. I suggest that the language of antisemitism serves the articulation of a vision of well-balanced, non-corrosive modernity based on a benign and harmonious kind of capitalism, cleaned of its destructive and disturbing aspects, while the latter are what Critical Theory in turn bases the hope for human emancipation on.

Marcel Stoetzler is Research Associate at Bangor University, UK, where he taught Sociology until 2025, and a fellow at the Frankel Institute for Advanced Judaic Studies at the University of Michigan (2026-27). His publications include Critical Theory and the Critique of Antisemitism (Bloomsbury, 2023) and Beginning Classical Social Theory (Manchester University Press, 2017). He works on Critical Theory, feminist theory and the theory of racism and antisemitism.

Panel 6: Antisemitism and Islamophobia: longue-durée History and Challenges of Colonial Memory (in English)

2 pm – 5:15 pm, Saturday, June 20

Bio To come

Round table 3: Muslim antisemitism / Anti-Judaism? interdisciplinary approaches (In English)

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Friday, June 19

Vincent Tiberj is full professor of political sociology at Sciences Po Bordeaux and researcher at the Émile Durkheim Center. Previously, he was a research fellow at Sciences Po Paris from 2002 to 2015. His research focuses on voting, systems of values, generational replacement, dynamics of prejudice, and the political sociology of immigration. He is part of the research team that conducted the yearly « racism barometer » of the National Consultative Commission on Human Rights (CNCDH and has developed the longitudinal tolerance index (LTI). He is the author of French Like the Others (with Sylvain Brouard, Temple University Press), La crispation hexagonale (Plon), Les citoyens qui viennent (PUF), and La droitisation française: mythe et réalité (PUF).

Round table 2: Education and prevention (in English)

9:15 am – 10:15 am, Friday June 19

Dominique Trimbur is Associate researcher at the Centre de Recherche Français à Jérusalem (CRFJ) and since 2002 Senior program associate at the Fondation pour la Mémoire de la Shoah (in charge of « History » and « Holocaust education » programs). Historian of the German-Israeli relations (1945-today) and of European presences in Ottoman and British Palestine, and in Israel.

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Round table 4 : Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (in French/en français)

Danny Trom est sociologue, directeur de recherche au CNRS, membre du LIER-FYT (EHESS). Ces deux derniers ouvrages : L’Etat de l’exil. Les Juifs, Israël, l’Europe, Paris Puf, 2023. Norbert Elias, une politique de la sociologie, Paris, Presses de l’EHESS, 2026.

Horkheimer and Adorno on Jews and Judaism: A Critical Revaluation

10 am – 12:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 1 : Critical Theory of Antisemitism I : Looking Back at the Work of the Early Frankfurt School (in English)

When Horkheimer and Adorno developed a new theory of anti-Semitism in the early 1940s, one lingering question was whether anti-Semitic stereotypes correspond in some way with certain “Jewish” behavioral patterns and character traits. But the socio-psychological mapping of contemporary Jewry revealed, first of all, the authors’ own stereotypes and biases toward Judaism and the Jews, as well as a deep conflict within their theoretical framework. Did Horkheimer and Adorno ever abandon this program in their post-WWII writings, or did they merely rephrase it in the language of democratic education?

Philipp von Wussow holds a Ph.D. from Düsseldorf University and the Habilitation from Goethe University Frankfurt. His publications include three books: Logik der Deutung: Adorno und die Philosophie (2007), Leo Strauss and the Theopolitics of Culture (2020), and Expertokratie: Über das schwierige Verhältnis von Wissen und Macht (2023). He teaches philosophy and Jewish thought at Goethe University.

5:30 pm – 7:30 pm, Saturday, June 20

Round table 4 : Antisemitism and the Fight Against it in France (in French/en français)

Michel Wieviorka est directeur d’études émérite à l’EHESS. Ses principales recherches et publications portent sur les mouvements sociaux et culturels, la démocratie, la violence, le terrorisme, ainsi que sur le racisme et l’antisémitisme. Il a dirigé le Centre d’Analyse et d’Intervention Sociologiques (CADIS -1993-2009), et la Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (FMSH -2009-2020), et présidé l’Association Internationale de Sociologie (ISA – 2006-2010). Il a été membre du conseil scientifique de l’European Research Council (ERC -2015-2020). Il co-dirige la Plateforme Internationale sur le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme (PIRA), les revues SOCIO et Violence: an International Journal, ainsi que la collection « Voix et regards » aux éd. de l’Aube. Son livre « La métamorphose de l’antisémitisme » sortira aux éd. du Seuil en octobre 2026.

Outlaws – Horkheimer, Hobbes, and the Persecution of the Jews

10 am – 12:45 pm, Thursday, June 18, Panel 1: Critical Theory of Antisemitism I : Looking Back at the Work of the Early Frankfurt School (in English)

In a crucial passage in Max Horkheimers essay « Die Juden und Europa » (1939), the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes is quoted. In the age of totalitarianism, Horkheimer says, the Jews are treated as outlaws, the one group living outside of civil states. To them the natural state of mankind still applies. According to Hobbes, in the natural state of mankind it is not against natural law to kill the enemy. I will pursue the relevance of Hobbes’ political theory for Horkheimer’s analysis of the persecution of the Jews in late capitalism.

Eva-Maria Ziege, Professor of Political Sociology, University of Bayreuth, Germany, since 2012. From 2006-2010 DAAD Associate Professor at the University of Washington, Seattle, 2010 and 2011 spells as Visiting Fellow at the Woolf Institute, Cambridge, UK. Publications: Antisemitismus und Gesellschaftstheorie. Die Frankfurter Schule im amerikanischen Exil, Frankfurt a.M. 2009; Ed. of T.W. Adorno Bemerkungen zu `The Authoritarian Personality` und weitere Texte, Frankfurt a.M. 2019; Ed. (with Gunzelin Schmid Noerr) Zur Kritik der regressiven Vernunft: Beiträge zur « Dialektik der Aufklärung », Wiesbaden 2019; Ed. (with Gunzelin Schmid Noerr) Wiedergänger Entfremdung. Zur Ambivalenz der Moderne, Frankfurt a.M. 2025; Forthcoming in 2026 Ed. (with Jakob Schultz / Michael Jeismann / Reinhard Blomert), Feindbestimmung Special Issue of « Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft ».